Svemir-se-vrti
English
Weitter Duckss's Theory of the Universe Universe and rotation (+20 New articles) The universe is rotating, after all
Pусскй
Теория Вселенной Веиттера Дуксса Вселенная и вращение (+ 20 Новые статьи) Вселенная всё-таки вращается
Hrvatski Weitter Duckss teorija svemira Svemir i vrtnja (+ 20 novih članaka) Objavljeni članci (2013, 14, 15.) Svemir, što je to U potrazi za izgubljenim svemirom (knjiga)

2004.
Theory of Zadar Zadarska teorija
rast-tijela
rast-tijela rast-tijela
 Kontakt e-mail:wduckss@gmail.com

Vakuum u prostoru ili neotkrivena materija?

English
Pусскй

Članak je nastavak na objavljene članke:
"Jesmo li slijepi ili ne želimo vidjeti tamnu tvar? "  i
"Zašto je Svemir hladan?" iz početka 2014.g.

„Vanjski prostor ima vrlo nisku gustoću i pritisak, i najbliži je fizički aproksimacija savršenom vakuumu.“ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum#Outer_space
„Intenziteta ( rasvjete ili zračenje ) od svjetlosti ili drugih linearnih valova zrakasto se šire iz točkastog izvora (energije po jedinici površine okomite na izvor) je obrnuto proporcionalna kvadratu udaljenosti od izvora; tako da objekt (iste veličine) dvostruko udaljen, prima samo jedna četvrtinu energije (u istom vremenskom razdoblju).“ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse-square_law#Light_and_other_electromagnetic_radiation

Ipak ovo nije točno.

„Da se radi o nekoj vrsti materije ukazuje da opadanje intenziteta nije istovjetno gravitaciji. Bliže Suncu bilježimo uobičajene anomalije. Merkur (0 ° N, 0 ° W  ~100°K;  85 ° N, 0 ° W  80° K) na tamnoj strani što je hladnije od Marsa (~130°K), slična anomalija je termo sfera na Zemlji.“ Weitter Duckss teorija svemira, naslov "Eter ili vakuum"

Ako ovome dodamo podatke za Mjesec (i td.):

„Površina temp. na Mjesecu: minimalna na ekvatoru 100 ° K“  i  
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter je izmjerio najniža ljetne temperature u kraterima na južnom polu od 35 K (-238 ° C; -397 ° F) , a samo 26 K (-247 ° C; -413 ° F) u neposrednoj blizini zimskog solsticija u sjevernoj polutki Hermite kratera . Ovo su najhladnije temperature u Sunčevom sustavu koje je ikad izmjerila letjelica, hladnije su čak i od površine Plutona .“  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon#Seasons

Ove rezultate (dokaze) nikako se ne može povezati sa opadanjem intenziteta zračenja kvadratom udaljenosti od izvora (Sunca). Ako postoje suprotni dokazi tada ne postoji vrijednost zakona o obrnuto proporcionalnom kvadratu udaljenosti od izvora.
U prilog negaciji vakuuma vidimo u cijelom volumenu Svemira, imamo okupljanje čestica u maglice i td. umjesto poštivanja zakona o izjednačavanju različitih tlakova čestica unutar jednog volumena.

(That said, gas in a vacuum system at normal conditions, between atmospheric pressure and somewhere slightly below 1 torr, is dense enough that it will flow towards the lower pressure – the mechanical pump inlet.) https://vacaero.com/gas-molecules-and-gas-flow.html )

Uspoređujući formacije maglica plina u Svemiru i oblaka na Plutonu, mjesecu Titanu ili Zemlji vidljiva je istovjetnost pojave koja nije ovisna o zakonima o vakuumu. Formiranje se događa po istim principima kada govorimo o formiranju ustroja materije uslijed privlačnih i drugih sila unutar medija materije. To što ne možemo mjeriti materiju izvan atmosfere u prostoru nikako ne znači da moramo zatvoriti oči pred dokazima  o njenom postojanju.

maglice-oblaci
1. By Credit: NASA, Jeff Hester, and Paul Scowen (Arizona State University) - http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/newsdesk/archive/releases/2003/34/image/a, Public Domain 
2. Zadar WDuckss

Postojanje materije možemo promatrati i tu na Zemlji. Balon napuhan u vodi 2 ili 3 kilometra duboko ispod površine vode eksplodirati će uslijed širenja zraka prije površine ili na površini, slično kao kod balona koje šaljemo izvan atmosfere, oni eksplodiraju uslijed izjednačavanja tlakova najdalje na 40 kilometara od površine Zemlje. Imamo različitu materiju i imamo različite rezultate, ali u konačnici rezultat je isti, tlakovi se izjednačavaju. Baloni se kreću suprotno smjeru privlačenja gravitacije, isključivo poštuju zakon o izjednačavanju različitih tlakova. Baloni „znaju“ gdje je rjeđa materija unutar volumena.

Različite materije egzistiraju jedna uz drugu i imaju manje ili više definiran prijelaz iz jedne u drugu, to nije moguće između vidljive materije i vakuuma jer tlakovi materije i vakuuma uvijek teže prema izjednačavanju, a to nije vidljivo između atmosfere i vakuuma te kod okupljanja plina (čestica) u maglice i td. Tu odmah izvan (i unutar atmosfere) postoji materija za koju znamo i imamo njenu definiciju, izračunali smo njene utjecaje na vidljivu materiju koju trebamo još samo otkriti.

12.02.2017.g.

Promatranje Svemira kroz boju

English
Pусскй

Poznata je stvar da kada valovi (svjetlost) prolaze kroz prizmu stvaraju dugu, spektar boja.  
Zalasci Sunca prikazuju se kao događaj posebne ljepote jer u kratkom vremenskom roku vide se sve boje spektra i uvijek završava sa crvenom. Omotač ili atmosfera Zemlje ponaša se kao prizma. Radi zakrivljenosti Zemlje, samim tim i atmosfere uslijed dužine prolaza kroz prizmu mijenjaju se boje (također Sunce i Mjesec su izgledom (vizualno) najveći kod izlaska i zalaska). Najduži prolaz valova (uslijed čega imamo najmanji intenzitet ili snaga valova) kroz atmosferu daje prekrasne nijanse crvene boje. Ovaj događaj postoji ujutro i uvečer pa možemo isključiti Dopplerov efekt, kao jedino objašnjenje, jer ujutro imamo smanjivanje razmaka, što je suprotno od večeri.

Izlazak-i-zalazak-Sunca

Kada promatramo Svemir i otkrivamo galaksije ujedno promatramo porast crvenog spektra kako raste udaljenost objekta. Najudaljenije galaksije imaju ujedno i najveći pomak prema crvenom. Danas to pripisujemo ekspanziji svemira radi Dopplerovog efekta, odnosno ako se tijela brže udaljuju od nas valovi su duži i boja je crvena, što su brzine udaljavanja veće veći je i pomak spektra prema crvenoj. Umjesto ekspanzije promatrao sam Svemira kroz efekte rotacije koja u potpunosti zadovoljava rezultate dobivene promatranjem Svemira za crveni spektar boje. Bliže galaksije imaju crveni i plavi spektralni pomak (brzine su negativne i pozitivne 100 i više km/s) te da nakon određene udaljenosti postoji samo crveni pomak ( za najudaljenije galaksije procjenjuje se brzina na 270.000 km/s). Svakako da rotacija u potpunosti pokriva promatranja astronoma za razliku od ekspanzije u koju danas niko više ne vjeruje (osim službenih krugova), kod rotacije, za razliku od ekspanzije, ne postoje paradoksi.

Ipak problem počinje sa dugom.

Svi dobiveni podaci nastali su na osnovu vezanja spektralnog pomaka za brzinu kretanja galaksija (ekspanziju) i nije se uzimalo u obzir da spektralni pomak ovisi o udaljenosti objekta. Veća udaljenost slabi intenzitet (snagu) valova(zračenja). Manji intenzitet valova očitavamo kao veći crveni pomak.  
Ovdje treba istaknuti i vrlo važnu činjenicu da iako nakon određene udaljenosti registriramo samo crveni pomak mi istovremeno registriramo, na toj i svim ostalim udaljenostima, sudare galaksija (registrirano je i 72 sudara klastera galaksija, iako svi imaju crveni pomak) što ukazuje da je privid da su brzine udaljavanja ili rotacije samo porasle, jer sudar znači plavi pomak u spektru za tijela koja se sudaraju. Privid je samo iz kuta promatranja galaksija kroz povećanje brzine.
Uz slabljenje intenziteta valova imamo i povećanje brzine, ali nikako u vrijednostima koje danas uzimamo kao neosporan dokaz. Rotacija klastera galaksija i Svemira odvija se višestruko sporije, to možemo vidjeti iz sličnosti bližih i vrlo udaljenih galaksija.  

Sva promatranja su potpuno  u skladu sa prevaljenom udaljenošću valova do  objekata (i porasta brzine) gdje crveno znači da promatrane galaksije koje se sudaraju imaju sličnu udaljenost od točke promatranja i imaju jednak crveni pomak, iako imaju suprotne pravce prilaženja jedna drugoj, (ove galaksije imaju plavi pomak između sebe i barem jedna bi trebala prilaziti prema promatračima).
Dobivena svjetlost, od galaksija, pomjera se  prema povećanju crvenog pomaka s slabljenjem intenziteta valova (zračenja) uslijed prevaljene distance i manjim dijelom zbog povećanja brzine prema površini klastera galaksija i Svemira.
13.o1.2017.g.



Weitter Duckss teorija svemira

http://www.ijser.org/onlineResearchPaperViewer.aspx?Weitter-Duckss-Theory-of-the-Universe.pdf

Author: Weitter Duckss (Slavko Sedic) Zadar Croatia

English
Pусски

Čitati dalje Weitter Duckss teorija svemira 


.

Ostali članci:
stariji
2016/2017

.

www.unexplained-mysteries.com

Why craters, not the old 4.5 bil. years?

Why are meteorites older than the Earth?

Started by Weitter Duckss Sep 21 2015 08:22 PM

krateri

On Earth is discovered and excavated a large number of craters whose age is 100 years (obska explosion) to 2 billion years (Vredefort, Free State South Africa, Yarrabubba Western Australia Australia) . https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_impact_craters_on_Earth

If the earth is 4.5 billion years old, why there are no traces (craters) formation. We should have craters from the time when the Earth was "cold" (4.2 bil. Years).

For all the meteorite was determined age of ~ 4.5 billion years for the oldest sample of the Earth, old age is estimated at 3.8 to 4,200,000,000 years, why? How old is the magma (the lava is still in eruption from the crater of the zero year)?

More: http://www.svemir-ipaksevrti.com/Universe-and-rotation.html#growth1
and:
Universe and rotation (published in US, Ru und Cro)

Supernovae are not our creators Started by Weitter Duckss, March 28

We have been listening for too long that supernovae (or just, novae) are responsible for our existence. They brought heavy, essential elements to our planet. Iron, uranium and other complex elements are said to have come from the universe to form our Earth.

To make the absurdity even bigger, there are not so many (only a few dozen) remains, made by the star explosions. According to Wikipedia, the amount of these supernova remains inside our galaxy ranges from 25 (or 40, if planetary nebulae are included) to 100, if all other nebulae and particle clouds are included (a molecular cloud, Bok globules, interstellar cloud, etc.). For the sake of the example: if we identify every nebula or cloud to be an exploded star – which is highly incorrect – and compare them to the total quantity of stars in the galaxy (100 – 400 billion of stars), it can be concluded that it is a completely neglectable quantity, in terms of the observations of the processes inside the galaxy and beyond. ...
Weitter Duckss 28 Mar 2016... 90 replies.... 3,420 views... last comment... Derek Willis... 14 Apr 2016

Other articles on www.unexplained-mysteries.com look here

.


www.academia.edu

Weitter Duckss's Theory of the Universe

 

The Universe is the main theme, which is discussed in this paper. The objectives are creating the sequence of relations or connections of two or more relations of evidence (for example, mass – radius) to create new measurable values. The observation starts from the obvious (red stars make up to 76,45% of all stars in our galaxy) and namely such importance is given to that matter. Making conclusions based on some spectacular, but minor values, is avoided (for example, shiny blue stars make only 0,00003% from the total quantity of the stars in our galaxy).

The analysis of every topic is based on the big totalities (the total number of galaxies, the total number of stars in the Milky Way), on the regularities that apply to all observed units – with the exceptions included – or phenomena related to all objects, avoiding the partial or individual separated parts of the totality. The Universe is here analyzed through the formation of matter, its growth and disintegration. Rotation is introduced as a feature that must be addressed to; it creates the relations between the neighboring and distant objects. The age of the Universe is analyzed through the approximate minimal assessment of time needed for some object to reach a particular stage by gathering matter, for example: a time needed to create a cluster of stars, consisting of a few tens of thousands of stars in a single place, due to the gravitational force and rotation. The analysis starts from the assessment that the majority of notions and evidence are generally familiar to vast majority of readers, therefore no particular links, leading to the definitions of a star, a galaxy, rotation, blue and red spectral shift, etc., are cited here. The notions such as gravity, tidal forces, rotation, etc., do not follow officially accepted definitions and they often differ structurally; for example, ...

Gravitational waves – a great discovery or a great scandal (a plagiarism)?

... The assertion of the authors to have seen a collision of two hypothetical, scientifically unproven objects (the collision of two „black holes“) indicates that „something is rotten in the state of Denmark.“ Why? A great discovery does not need such presentations that automatically cause suspicion and start large-scale discussions. The only possible reason could be that they are throwing dust in our eyes and covering the truth about what they have really discovered.

A new article suddenly appeared on February 25th, http://phys.org/news/2016-02-pulsar-web-low-frequency-gravitational.html and all of a sudden, a new change of the already new paradigm occurred again. Gravitational waves could be created by pulsars that have a fast rotation!
This utter „shift“ seems to be at the core of the discovery, as well as the confirmation that these are not the gravitational waves, predicted by Einstein himself (he did not create nor did he accept the term „black hole“), but the waves emitted by every object that rotates around its axis; the faster the rotation – the more important the waves, and vice versa.

This is no Einstein anymore, this is Weitter Duckss and his texts, made in the last 12 years.
The Theory of Zadar was published in 2004. and there it is stated:

„The rotation of particles within a system, as well as the parts of a system inside the particular structures, is the weight, and is also a gravity, which unites the force of attraction, ...


Other articles in English language:
Weitter Duckss's Theory of the Universe
Universe and rotation
(+20 New articles)
The universe is rotating, after all


www.newtheory.ru

Bселенная и вращение (почему телескопы врут? ...)
  СообщениеВетер Дыкcc11 окт 2015, 07:43

Введение: Почему телескопы врут?;
  http://www.svemir-ipaksevrti.com/Ruski-Kosmos.html#2d
Где эта СИНГУЛЯРНОСТЬ?; 
http://www.svemir-ipaksevrti.com/Ruski-Kosmos.html#7d
Гравитация и антигравитация; 
http://www.svemir-ipaksevrti.com/Ruski-Kosmos.html#5d

ВСЕЛЕННАЯ И ВРАЩЕНИЕ

Автор: Weitter Duckss (Славко Седич) Задар Хорватия
Переводчик: проф. Зоран Чoco (Зуле);zcoso@unizd.hr

Достаточно посмотреть одну из многочисленных фотографий Вселенной и её частей, чтобы понять, что она, на самом деле, объём, расширяющийся во всех направлениях до границ видимости наших телескопов и спутников для исследования Вселенной. Этот факт нельзя забывать никогда, ни в момент, иначе нам очень легко может случиться, что объёмное пространство начинаем воспринимать как поверхность, плоскость или его сравнивать с предметами и явлениями на Земле.

В объёме нет прямых или кривых линий, или каких-то других геометрических объектов; существует только открытый объём, расширяющийся вдаль до 13.8 миллиардов световых лет. Эта цифра относится к объекту (галактике), обнаруженному с Земли с помощью наших инструментов. Это возможно только потому, что объекты, чья масса больше 10% массы нашего Солнца (и некоторые меньшие объекты, у которых выполнились для того нужные условия) постоянно излучают радиацию, которую инструменты регистрируют как свет.

Kosmos


Процессы во Вселенной

26 дек 2015, 10:47

Как это можно видеть в результатах исследований процессов на Земле, все процессы кругообразные: появляются, увеличиваются и разлагаются. Разложение материи очень частое явление во Вселенной. Самый радикальный пример – случаи взрывов звёзд разных величин, называемых новыми и сверхновыми, в зависимости от величины взорванной звезды. Другие способы разложения материи происходят при столкновениях объектов во Вселенной или радиации с видимой материей. ...


Pусскй
Теория Вселенной Веиттера Дуксса
Вселенная и вращение (+ 20 Новые статьи)
Вселенная всё-таки вращается

.

space.com-commentary.html "Red giants are stars that are nearing the end of their fuel supplies and have begun to puff up and expand."

Over 75.45% of stars in the Milky Way are red stars. We have a new prophets of doomsday!
Authors measurements must decide whether the red star and a cold or the B type hot and blue-white.
Betelgeuze has about 1,000 radius of the Sun and is still alive as well as small, red star mass 0,008 mass Sun.
It's time to "science" determine type of fuel for each star (kerosene, oil, radioactive, wood, gas ...) it would be a "great" contribution to humanity.

"The causal relation between a star and its temperature, gravity, radius and color"

Great, Mysterious Balls of Fire Speed by Dying Star
By Elizabeth Howell, Space.com Contributor | October 6, 2016 07:19pm ET

Red giants are stars that are nearing the end of their fuel supplies and have begun to puff up and expand. While the fireballs could not have been ejected by the star, it could be that an unseen companion star is responsible for the chaos, according to a new study of this cosmic firing squad. ..

Space.com

"older" comentari on space.com

.

phys.org-commentary

September 10, 2016

"Theory suggests that flares or a stellar wind, both of which are driven by magnetic fields, could scour the planet and strip away any atmosphere. In that case, Proxima b might be like Earth's Moon - located in the habitable zone, but not at all friendly to life. "

The atmosphere of the body has its own process and does not depend on solar Vjetori. This is evident in the Sun system (Mercury has no atmosphere, the Earth and Venus, have the atmosphere, Mars has little atmosphere, the moon has no atmosphere). There is no link between the formation of the atmosphere and the solar wind. Despite this shortcoming, the article is good. From the observation of the interior of the Earth we know that all bodies have multiple layers. It excludes "fully convective and therefore unable to support magnetic dynamos" red and other stars.

Proxima Centauri might be more sunlike than we thought
October 11, 2016

An artist's illustration depicts the interior of a low-mass star. Such stars have different interior structures than our Sun, so they are not expected to show magnetic activity cycles. However, astronomers have discovered that the nearby star Proxima Centauri defies that expectation and shows signs of a 7-year activity cycle. Credit: NASA/CXC/M.Weiss

Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2016-10-proxima-centauri-sunlike-thought.html#jCp


"older" comentari on phys.org

.

NASA commentary

"Those factors are the reddening of light due to the expansion of space, the universe's dynamic nature, and the absorption of light by intergalactic dust and gas. All combined, this keeps the night sky dark to our vision."

Okay, but why is darkness 100 miles above the Earth's surface? Why is darkness between the Sun and the planets and other bodies? Here, there is no mentioned factors!

"The Sun emits radiation (not light), which by itself is not made of photons and it does not glow either. There is a dark space without visible matter between the Sun and Earth. Light appears when radiation collides with the visible matter ; in our case, with the atmosphere. On the Moon, it is the Moon's surface, etc. radiation does not glow, nor does matter, except for the radiation-emitting objects. Light is created when there is a collision of radiation and matter.

The causal relation of space and the absence of light in Universe

Oct. 13, 2016
Hubble Reveals Observable Universe Contains 10 Times More Galaxies Than Previously Thought

The universe suddenly looks a lot more crowded, thanks to a deep-sky census assembled from surveys taken by NASA's Hubble Space Telescope and other observatories.
Astronomers came to the surprising conclusion that there are at least 10 times more galaxies in the observable universe than previously thought.

NASA

.

Publication (References)

https://www.academia.edu/21421411/The_Reverse_Influence_of_Cyclones_to_the_Rotation_of_Stars   https://independent.academia.edu/WeitterDuckss other

http://www.ijser.org/onlineResearchPaperViewer.aspx?Weitter-Duckss-Theory-of-the-Universe.pdf  
http://www.ijoart.org/research-paper-publishing_october-2016.shtml Universe and rotation
http://www.ijser.org/onlineResearchPaperViewer.aspx?The-observation-process-in-the-universe-through-the-database.pdf
http://www.ijoar.org/journals/IJOAR/Volume4_Issue11_november2016.html The observation process in the universe
http://www.ijser.org/onlineResearchPaperViewer.aspx?THE-UNIVERSE-IS-ROTATING-AFTER-ALL.pdf
http://www.ijser.org/onlineResearchPaperViewer.aspx?Observation-of-the-Universe-through-questions.pdf http://www.ijser.org/onlineResearchPaperViewer.aspx?Is-there-fast-and-slow-combustion-of-stars.pdf 2017.y. http://www.ijser.org/onlineResearchPaperViewer.aspx?Observing-the-Universe-through-colors--blue-and-red-shift.pdf.pdf

http://www.newtheory.ru/astronomy/processi-vo-vselennoy-t3636.html?sid=95cdc8ce9a8e29c91d2e5342171d4fb8 http://www.newtheory.ru/astronomy/pochemu-est-raznici-mejdu-strukturami-obektov-nashey-sistemi-t3919.html etc.

http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/topic/301520-quicker-burning-and-temperature-of-star/
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/topic/295090-what-are-the-lakes-on-titan-made-of/
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/topic/299470-weitter-ducksss-theory-of-the-universe/
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/topic/298246-differences-in-structure-of-the-body/
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/topic/292076-gravitational-waves/
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/topic/267990-mars-life-creation-in-universe/
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/topic/268345-why-is-the-universe-dark/
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/topic/268680-atom-why-did-cern-fail/
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/topic/267586-the-universe-is-rotating/ etc.

https://www.facebook.com/slavko.sedic (comments on articles  space.com; phys.org; NASA etc.)     


.