Svemir-se-vrti
English
Weitter Duckss's Theory of the Universe Universe and rotation (+20 New articles) The universe is rotating, after all
Pусскй
Теория Вселенной Веиттера Дуксса Вселенная и вращение (+ 20 Новые статьи) Вселенная всё-таки вращается
Hrvatski Weitter Duckss teorija svemira Svemir i vrtnja (+ 20 novih članaka) Objavljeni članci (2013, 14, 15.) Svemir, što je to U potrazi za izgubljenim svemirom (knjiga)

2004.
Theory of Zadar Zadarska teorija
rast-tijela
rast-tijela rast-tijela
 Kontakt e-mail:wduckss@gmail.com

Zašto je evolucija zvijezda netočna?

English
Pусскй

„Stellar evolution starts with the gravitational collapse of a giant molecular cloud .“ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_evolution#Protostar

„Protostars with masses less than roughly 0.08 M☉ (1.6×1029 kg) never reach temperatures high enough for nuclear fusion of hydrogen to begin. These are known as brown dwarfs. The International Astronomical Union defines brown dwarfs as stars massive enough to fuse deuterium at some point in their lives (13 Jupiter masses (MJ), 2.5 × 1028 kg, or 0.0125 M☉). https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stellar_evolution#Brown_dwarfs_and_sub-stellar_objects

Možda je ovo, citirano iz Wikipedie, nekada bilo prihvatljivo jer čitatelji nisu mogli provjeriti realno stanje iz baze podataka o zvijezdama i drugim tijelima u galaksiji i šire. Danas kada imamo dovoljan broj istraženih tijela, exo planeta, braon „patuljaka“ i ostalih zvijezda i galaksija kao i klastera galaksija nije teško zaključiti da stare teorije su potpuno promašena razmišljanja i loše izvedene misaone konstrukcije.

U sljedećoj tabeli naveo sam nekoliko primjera exo planeta koji bez ikakve sumnje govore suprotno starim teorijama. Masa Jupitera je 1/1047 mase Sunca.

 

 

exoplanet

 

Maas of Jupiter

 

Temperature K

 

Semi major axis AU/ Parent star spectral typ

1.

Hottest Kepler-70b

0.440 Earth

7.143

0.006            O (sdB)

2.

WASP-33b

4,59 Jupiter

2.451

0.02558         A5

3.

WASP-121b

1.183 J

2.358

0.02544         F6V

4.

WASP-87b

2.18

2.322

0.02946         F5

5.

B Tauri FU braon patuljak

15

2.375

700   M7.25 (M9.25)

6.

WASP-12b

1.404

2.319

0.02293          G0

7.

HIP 78530 b

24

2.700

710                 B9V

8.

Kepler-13b

6.6

2.750

0.03423      8.500°K

9.

DH Tauri b

12

2.750

330                M0.5V

10.

PSR J1719-1438 b

1.2

5.375

0.00442         Pulsar

11.

KOI-368.01

2.1

3.060

0.6                 F6

12.

KOI-55 C

0,0021

6.319

0.0076           B4

13.

CT Chamaeleontis b

2.4

2.500

440,0             K7

14.

HAT-P-7b

1.709

2.733

0.0379           F6

15.

OGLE2-TR-L9

4.34

2.154.6

0.0308           F3

16.

WASP-48 b

0.98

2.030

0.03444       5.990°K

17.

UScoCTIO 108 b

14

2.350

670                  M7

18.

WASP-103 b

1.47

2.508

0.01985           F8V

19.

Kepler-10 b

0,010475

2.169

0.01684            G

20.

WASP-100b

1.69

2.190

0.0457              F2

21.

WASP-72b

1.01

2.210

0.03655            F7

22.

WASP-18 b

1,165 (10.43)

2.187,5

0.02047           F6

23

Oph 11 B

21

2.478

243.0               M9

24.

WASP-78 b

1.16

2.006.7

0.0415             F8

25

KELT-7 b

1.28

2.048

0.04415     6.789°K

26

WASP-111 b

1.83

2.140

0.03914           F5

 

Iz tabele vidimo da planeti
Hottest Kepler-70b 7.143° K,  PSR J1719-1438 b 5.375° K,  KOI-55 C 6.319° K, su daleko iznad temperatura za zvijezde M tipa


M typ star

0.08–0.45

≤ 0.7

2,400–3,700

M 76,45%

iz fast-and-slow-combustion.

Ostali planeti iz tabele temperaturno pripadaju u klasu M zvijezda. Maksimalma temperatura magme „(komatiite) je 1.600°C (Bazaltni protoke lave obično imaju temperaturu erupcije oko 1.100 do 1.250 ° C.)( Magma is a complex high-temperature fluid substance.)“ Wikipedia.
Planeti iz tabele imaju temperature značajno iznad maksimalnih temperatura magme što u prijevodu znači da su rastaljena tekuća (fluidna) tijela ili zvijezde.

Ako slijedimo logiku da je temperatura planeta vezana za malu udaljenost od zvijezde koja je uzrok visoke temperature, tada nema objašnjenja za HIP 78530 b (R/B 7.) koji je udaljen 710 AU od matične zvijezde, Jupiter je udaljen 5.20260 AU, Edgeworth–Kuiper belt od 30 AJ do 50 AJ od Sunca (kao i za R/B 23.;  17.;  13.;  9.;  5.;)
Većina exo planeta iz tabele je na udaljenosto 0,02 do 0,05 AU od matične zvijezde, ipak donositi zaključak da je utjecaj blizine zvijezde prevladavajuću za temperaturu planeta bez uvida da postoje na istoj udaljenosti :

Wolf 1061b, ……………...210°K, ………………….0.035509 AU,  
KOI-1843.01, …………….800°K, ………………….0,039 AU,   
Gliese 3634 b, ……………565,4°K, ………………..0,0287 AU,   
Kepler-45b, ………………774°K, ………………….0.027 AU, 
HD 63454 b, ……………...926,7°K, ………………..0,036 AU,   
HD 40307 b, ……………...804,5°K,  …………….....0.0468 AU,   
HAT-P-20 b, ………………888,3°K, ………………0.0361 AU,    
WASP-10 b, ………………984,3°K,………………. 0.0371 AU,   
HATS-6 b, ………………....712,8°K,  ………………0.03623 AU,   
Gliese 436 b, ……………...650,3°K, ……………….0.0291 AU, 
GJ 160.2 b, ………………..100°K,  ………………...0,053 AU, 
Gliese 1214 b, …………….604°K, ………………....0.01488 AU i td.
lako možemo pogriješiti.

Uvrstimo u formulu i spektralni tip od matične zvijezde od planeta:

WASP-11b/HAT-P-10(b)…K3V,…… 0,0439 AU, .. ….943.2 °K;
HD 63454 b ……………….K4V,…… 0,036 AU …... ..926,7°K;
HD 330075 b………………G5,…….. 0,043 AU,…... ..1.023°K;
TrES-2b / Kepler-1b, ……...G0V,…… 0.03556 AU,… albedo (Ag) 0,0136;
HD 219134 (b) ……………K3V,.. …..0.0382 AU,……800°K;
HD 102195 (b)…………….K0V, ……0,049 AU,…… 963,1°K;
HD 40307( b) ~5.000°K…..K2,5V, …0,0468 AU,…. ..804,5°K;
OGLE-TR-111(b)…………G ili K, …0,047 AU, …….940°K;
WASP-10(b)………………K5,…….. 0,0371 AU,….. .946,8°K;
HD 215497 (b)…………….K3V, ……0,047 AU,…….984.3°K;
Gliese 3470 (b)……………3.600°K,…0,031 AU,…. ...604±98°K;

  Dodajmo ovdje PSR J1719-1438 b koja kruži oko pulsara (bez mjerljive temperature za instrumente)   na udaljenosti od 0,004 AU i ima temperaturu od 5.348°K i Hottest Kepler-70b koji uz matičnu zvijezdu kruži na 0,006 AU koja ima temperaturu 27.730°K. Na osnovu ova dva planeta odmah možemo vidjeti da temperatura matične zvijezde nema prevladavajući utjecaj na temperaturu planeta. (Korišteni podaci su iz Wikipedia i exoplanet.eu/ )

Zaključak, 

„Rast se ne zaustavlja samo sa atomima, naprotiv udruživanje teče dalje (spajanjem, kemijskim reakcijama i kombinirano) tako nastaje plin, prašina, pijesak, stijene koje nazivamo asteroidima i kometima… planeti, kada planeti dosegnu 10% mase Sunca postaju zvijezde koje mogu biti doista velike (super divovi). 
Da rast tijela je stvarnost dokazuju milijuni kratera razasutih po tijelima našeg sustava a da su ti procesi neprekinuti i danas jednako živi kao i u bilo kojem dijelu prošlosti, dokazi su stalni udari asteroida u naš omotač i zemlju ( procjene govore da na Zemlju padne od 4.000 do 100.000 tona izvan zemaljskog materijala godišnje“ iz  „Svemir i vrtnja/ Procesi

„Dovoljno je promatrati masu tijela, njezin odnos sa drugim tijelima, rotaciju tijela kao i rotaciju centralnog tijela, sastav tijela i udaljenost orbite i donijeti valjanu procjenu za svako tijelo i bez ikakve potrebe za nuklearnim fuzijama, fisijama i sagorijevanju materije.“ Iz „Weitter duckss teorija svemira“ i „Uzročna veza rotacije zvijezde sa temperaturom, gravitacijom, polumjerom i bojom zvijezde 31.03.2017. g.

Dodatak

Brown Dwarf
Planets shine by reflected light; stars shine by producing their own light.

Uvjerimo se u laži službenih stajališta (Evolucije, sagorijevanja, termonuklearnih reakcija itd.).

Super masivne zvijezde

S Cassiopeiae  Radius 930   R Sun, Temperatura 1.800 K,
CW Leonis Mass Radius 700 R Sun, Temperature 2,200 K,

Imaju temperature niže od

WASP-14b Mass (m) 7.725 + 0.43-0.67 MJ, Radius (r) 1.259 + 0.08-0.058 RJDensity (ρ) 5133 kg m-3,Surface gravity (g) 126.2 m / s² (12.87 g), Temperature (T) 2800 K,
Teide 1 Mass 0.052 M☉, Radius ~ 0.1 R, Temperature 2600 ± 150 K
2M1207 Mass ~ 0.025 M, Radius ~ 0.25 R, Temperature 2550 ± 150 K

I tako zvanih planeta

B Tauri FU  2.375 K (udaljen 700 AU od najbliže zvijezde), 0,440 M Earhh,
HIP 78530 b 2.700 K (710 AU), 24 M Jup,
DH Tauri b 2.750 K (330 AU), 12 M Jup,
CT Chamaeleontis b 2.500 K (440 AU), 2,4 M Jup,
UScoCTIO 108 b 2.350 K (670 AU), 14 M Jup,
Oph 11 B 2.478 K (243 AU) 21 M Jup. (from table)

Sličnu temperaturu sa

DENIS-P J020529.0-115925A Temperature 1,800 K,
OTS 44 Mass 0.011 M Sun, Radius 0.23 -0.57 R, Temperature 1,700 -2,300 K

Ako "planet" (OTS 44 i td.) „It is among the lowest-mass free-floating substellar objects, with approximately 11.5 times the mass of Jupiter, or approximately 1.1% that of the Sun.“ Wikiwand , („Brown dwarfs are substellar objects that occupy the mass range between the heaviest gas giant planets and the lightest stars, of approximately 13 to 75–80 Jupiter masses (MJ),“ Wikipedia) ima temperaturu istu ili veću od zvijezde 930 R Sun, kako ovdje možemo raspravljati o vjerodostojnosti službenih teorija (oni ove teorije prodaju kao vrhunsko znanje).

Sledeća Brown Dwarfts imaju površinsku temperaturu identičnu temperaturi magme na Zemlji.

Cha 110913-773444
Mass 8 (+7,−3 ) MJup
Radius 1.8 RJup
Luminosity 0.000096 L☉
Temperature 1,350 K

PSO J318.5-22
Mass (m) 6.5 [1] MJ
Radius (r) 1.53 RJ
Temperature (T) 1160 (+30, -40) K

Luhman 16A
Mass 0.04-0.05 M☉
Radius 0.11 R☉
Luminosity 0.000031 L☉
Temperature 1350 K

Luhman 16B
Mass 0.03-0.05 M☉
Radius 0.12 R☉
Luminosity 0.000025 L☉
Temperature 1210 K

HAT-P-2b
Mass (m) 8.00 ± 0.97 [4] MJ
Radius (r) 1.106 ± 0.061 [4] RJ
Density (ρ) 7300 ± 1600 [4] kg m-3
Surface gravity (g) 162 ± 27 [4] m / s²
Temperature (T) 1187 K

epsilon Indi
These yield masses of 47 ± 10 and 28 ± 7 times the mass of Jupiter, and radii of 0.091 ± 0.005 and 0.096 ± 0.005 solar radii, for Epsilon Indi Ba and Epsilon Indi Bb, respectively.[29] The effective temperatures are 1300–1340 K and 880–940 K,

Gliese 229 B
Luminosity: 0.000006 * Sun
Mass: 0.05 * Sun (45 * Jupiter)
Diameter: 0.1027 * Sun (1 * Jupiter)
Temperature 970 K (1.300 F)
SCR 1845-6357B.
„The companion, classified as a T-dwarf, has an observed projected distance of 4.1 AU, estimated mass between 40 and 50 times the mass of Jupiter, and an estimated effective temperature of  950 K.“ i td.

Dovoljno dokaza da se stare teorije (Evolucija zvijezda, sagorijevanje zvijezda, termonuklearni procesi u zvijezdama i td.) izbrišu iz znanosti i pošalju u povijest. 23.04.2017. g.


Weitter Duckss teorija svemira

http://www.ijser.org/onlineResearchPaperViewer.aspx?Weitter-Duckss-Theory-of-the-Universe.pdf

Author: Weitter Duckss (Slavko Sedic) Zadar Croatia

English
Pусскй

Čitati dalje Weitter Duckss teorija svemira 


.

Ostali članci:
stariji
2016/2017

.

www.unexplained-mysteries.com

Why craters, not the old 4.5 bil. years?

Why are meteorites older than the Earth?

Started by Weitter Duckss Sep 21 2015 08:22 PM

krateri

On Earth is discovered and excavated a large number of craters whose age is 100 years (obska explosion) to 2 billion years (Vredefort, Free State South Africa, Yarrabubba Western Australia Australia) . https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_impact_craters_on_Earth

If the earth is 4.5 billion years old, why there are no traces (craters) formation. We should have craters from the time when the Earth was "cold" (4.2 bil. Years).

For all the meteorite was determined age of ~ 4.5 billion years for the oldest sample of the Earth, old age is estimated at 3.8 to 4,200,000,000 years, why? How old is the magma (the lava is still in eruption from the crater of the zero year)?

More: http://www.svemir-ipaksevrti.com/Universe-and-rotation.html#growth1
and:
Universe and rotation (published in US, Ru und Cro)

Supernovae are not our creators Started by Weitter Duckss, March 28

We have been listening for too long that supernovae (or just, novae) are responsible for our existence. They brought heavy, essential elements to our planet. Iron, uranium and other complex elements are said to have come from the universe to form our Earth.

To make the absurdity even bigger, there are not so many (only a few dozen) remains, made by the star explosions. According to Wikipedia, the amount of these supernova remains inside our galaxy ranges from 25 (or 40, if planetary nebulae are included) to 100, if all other nebulae and particle clouds are included (a molecular cloud, Bok globules, interstellar cloud, etc.). For the sake of the example: if we identify every nebula or cloud to be an exploded star – which is highly incorrect – and compare them to the total quantity of stars in the galaxy (100 – 400 billion of stars), it can be concluded that it is a completely neglectable quantity, in terms of the observations of the processes inside the galaxy and beyond. ...
Weitter Duckss 28 Mar 2016... 90 replies.... 3,420 views... last comment... Derek Willis... 14 Apr 2016

Other articles on www.unexplained-mysteries.com look here

.


www.academia.edu

Weitter Duckss's Theory of the Universe

 

The Universe is the main theme, which is discussed in this paper. The objectives are creating the sequence of relations or connections of two or more relations of evidence (for example, mass – radius) to create new measurable values. The observation starts from the obvious (red stars make up to 76,45% of all stars in our galaxy) and namely such importance is given to that matter. Making conclusions based on some spectacular, but minor values, is avoided (for example, shiny blue stars make only 0,00003% from the total quantity of the stars in our galaxy).

The analysis of every topic is based on the big totalities (the total number of galaxies, the total number of stars in the Milky Way), on the regularities that apply to all observed units – with the exceptions included – or phenomena related to all objects, avoiding the partial or individual separated parts of the totality. The Universe is here analyzed through the formation of matter, its growth and disintegration. Rotation is introduced as a feature that must be addressed to; it creates the relations between the neighboring and distant objects. The age of the Universe is analyzed through the approximate minimal assessment of time needed for some object to reach a particular stage by gathering matter, for example: a time needed to create a cluster of stars, consisting of a few tens of thousands of stars in a single place, due to the gravitational force and rotation. The analysis starts from the assessment that the majority of notions and evidence are generally familiar to vast majority of readers, therefore no particular links, leading to the definitions of a star, a galaxy, rotation, blue and red spectral shift, etc., are cited here. The notions such as gravity, tidal forces, rotation, etc., do not follow officially accepted definitions and they often differ structurally; for example, ...

Gravitational waves – a great discovery or a great scandal (a plagiarism)?

... The assertion of the authors to have seen a collision of two hypothetical, scientifically unproven objects (the collision of two „black holes“) indicates that „something is rotten in the state of Denmark.“ Why? A great discovery does not need such presentations that automatically cause suspicion and start large-scale discussions. The only possible reason could be that they are throwing dust in our eyes and covering the truth about what they have really discovered.

A new article suddenly appeared on February 25th, http://phys.org/news/2016-02-pulsar-web-low-frequency-gravitational.html and all of a sudden, a new change of the already new paradigm occurred again. Gravitational waves could be created by pulsars that have a fast rotation!
This utter „shift“ seems to be at the core of the discovery, as well as the confirmation that these are not the gravitational waves, predicted by Einstein himself (he did not create nor did he accept the term „black hole“), but the waves emitted by every object that rotates around its axis; the faster the rotation – the more important the waves, and vice versa.

This is no Einstein anymore, this is Weitter Duckss and his texts, made in the last 12 years.
The Theory of Zadar was published in 2004. and there it is stated:

„The rotation of particles within a system, as well as the parts of a system inside the particular structures, is the weight, and is also a gravity, which unites the force of attraction, ...


Other articles in English language:
Weitter Duckss's Theory of the Universe
Universe and rotation
(+20 New articles)
The universe is rotating, after all


www.newtheory.ru

Bселенная и вращение (почему телескопы врут? ...)
  СообщениеВетер Дыкcc11 окт 2015, 07:43

Введение: Почему телескопы врут?;
  http://www.svemir-ipaksevrti.com/Ruski-Kosmos.html#2d
Где эта СИНГУЛЯРНОСТЬ?; 
http://www.svemir-ipaksevrti.com/Ruski-Kosmos.html#7d
Гравитация и антигравитация; 
http://www.svemir-ipaksevrti.com/Ruski-Kosmos.html#5d

ВСЕЛЕННАЯ И ВРАЩЕНИЕ

Автор: Weitter Duckss (Славко Седич) Задар Хорватия
Переводчик: проф. Зоран Чoco (Зуле);zcoso@unizd.hr

Достаточно посмотреть одну из многочисленных фотографий Вселенной и её частей, чтобы понять, что она, на самом деле, объём, расширяющийся во всех направлениях до границ видимости наших телескопов и спутников для исследования Вселенной. Этот факт нельзя забывать никогда, ни в момент, иначе нам очень легко может случиться, что объёмное пространство начинаем воспринимать как поверхность, плоскость или его сравнивать с предметами и явлениями на Земле.

В объёме нет прямых или кривых линий, или каких-то других геометрических объектов; существует только открытый объём, расширяющийся вдаль до 13.8 миллиардов световых лет. Эта цифра относится к объекту (галактике), обнаруженному с Земли с помощью наших инструментов. Это возможно только потому, что объекты, чья масса больше 10% массы нашего Солнца (и некоторые меньшие объекты, у которых выполнились для того нужные условия) постоянно излучают радиацию, которую инструменты регистрируют как свет.

Kosmos


Процессы во Вселенной

26 дек 2015, 10:47

Как это можно видеть в результатах исследований процессов на Земле, все процессы кругообразные: появляются, увеличиваются и разлагаются. Разложение материи очень частое явление во Вселенной. Самый радикальный пример – случаи взрывов звёзд разных величин, называемых новыми и сверхновыми, в зависимости от величины взорванной звезды. Другие способы разложения материи происходят при столкновениях объектов во Вселенной или радиации с видимой материей. ...


Pусскй
Теория Вселенной Веиттера Дуксса
Вселенная и вращение (+ 20 Новые статьи)
Вселенная всё-таки вращается

.

space.com-commentary.html "Red giants are stars that are nearing the end of their fuel supplies and have begun to puff up and expand."

Over 75.45% of stars in the Milky Way are red stars. We have a new prophets of doomsday!
Authors measurements must decide whether the red star and a cold or the B type hot and blue-white.
Betelgeuze has about 1,000 radius of the Sun and is still alive as well as small, red star mass 0,008 mass Sun.
It's time to "science" determine type of fuel for each star (kerosene, oil, radioactive, wood, gas ...) it would be a "great" contribution to humanity.

"The causal relation between a star and its temperature, gravity, radius and color"

Great, Mysterious Balls of Fire Speed by Dying Star
By Elizabeth Howell, Space.com Contributor | October 6, 2016 07:19pm ET

Red giants are stars that are nearing the end of their fuel supplies and have begun to puff up and expand. While the fireballs could not have been ejected by the star, it could be that an unseen companion star is responsible for the chaos, according to a new study of this cosmic firing squad. ..

Space.com

"older" comentari on space.com

.

phys.org-commentary

September 10, 2016

"Theory suggests that flares or a stellar wind, both of which are driven by magnetic fields, could scour the planet and strip away any atmosphere. In that case, Proxima b might be like Earth's Moon - located in the habitable zone, but not at all friendly to life. "

The atmosphere of the body has its own process and does not depend on solar Vjetori. This is evident in the Sun system (Mercury has no atmosphere, the Earth and Venus, have the atmosphere, Mars has little atmosphere, the moon has no atmosphere). There is no link between the formation of the atmosphere and the solar wind. Despite this shortcoming, the article is good. From the observation of the interior of the Earth we know that all bodies have multiple layers. It excludes "fully convective and therefore unable to support magnetic dynamos" red and other stars.

Proxima Centauri might be more sunlike than we thought
October 11, 2016

An artist's illustration depicts the interior of a low-mass star. Such stars have different interior structures than our Sun, so they are not expected to show magnetic activity cycles. However, astronomers have discovered that the nearby star Proxima Centauri defies that expectation and shows signs of a 7-year activity cycle. Credit: NASA/CXC/M.Weiss

Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2016-10-proxima-centauri-sunlike-thought.html#jCp


"older" comentari on phys.org

.

NASA commentary

"Those factors are the reddening of light due to the expansion of space, the universe's dynamic nature, and the absorption of light by intergalactic dust and gas. All combined, this keeps the night sky dark to our vision."

Okay, but why is darkness 100 miles above the Earth's surface? Why is darkness between the Sun and the planets and other bodies? Here, there is no mentioned factors!

"The Sun emits radiation (not light), which by itself is not made of photons and it does not glow either. There is a dark space without visible matter between the Sun and Earth. Light appears when radiation collides with the visible matter ; in our case, with the atmosphere. On the Moon, it is the Moon's surface, etc. radiation does not glow, nor does matter, except for the radiation-emitting objects. Light is created when there is a collision of radiation and matter.

The causal relation of space and the absence of light in Universe

Oct. 13, 2016
Hubble Reveals Observable Universe Contains 10 Times More Galaxies Than Previously Thought

The universe suddenly looks a lot more crowded, thanks to a deep-sky census assembled from surveys taken by NASA's Hubble Space Telescope and other observatories.
Astronomers came to the surprising conclusion that there are at least 10 times more galaxies in the observable universe than previously thought.

NASA

.

Publication (References)

https://www.academia.edu/21421411/The_Reverse_Influence_of_Cyclones_to_the_Rotation_of_Stars   https://independent.academia.edu/WeitterDuckss other

http://www.ijser.org/onlineResearchPaperViewer.aspx?Weitter-Duckss-Theory-of-the-Universe.pdf  
http://www.ijoart.org/research-paper-publishing_october-2016.shtml Universe and rotation
http://www.ijser.org/onlineResearchPaperViewer.aspx?The-observation-process-in-the-universe-through-the-database.pdf
http://www.ijoar.org/journals/IJOAR/Volume4_Issue11_november2016.html The observation process in the universe
http://www.ijser.org/onlineResearchPaperViewer.aspx?THE-UNIVERSE-IS-ROTATING-AFTER-ALL.pdf
http://www.ijser.org/onlineResearchPaperViewer.aspx?Observation-of-the-Universe-through-questions.pdf http://www.ijser.org/onlineResearchPaperViewer.aspx?Is-there-fast-and-slow-combustion-of-stars.pdf 2017 .y. http://www.ijser.org/onlineResearchPaperViewer.aspx?Observing-the-Universe-through-colors--blue-and-red-shift.pdf.pdf http://www.ijser.org/onlineResearchPaperViewer.aspx?Vacuum-in-space-or-undetected-matter.pdf 2017. y.

http://www.newtheory.ru/astronomy/processi-vo-vselennoy-t3636.html?sid=95cdc8ce9a8e29c91d2e5342171d4fb8 http://www.newtheory.ru/astronomy/pochemu-est-raznici-mejdu-strukturami-obektov-nashey-sistemi-t3919.html etc.

http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/topic/301520-quicker-burning-and-temperature-of-star/
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/topic/295090-what-are-the-lakes-on-titan-made-of/
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/topic/299470-weitter-ducksss-theory-of-the-universe/
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/topic/298246-differences-in-structure-of-the-body/
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/topic/292076-gravitational-waves/
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/topic/267990-mars-life-creation-in-universe/
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/topic/268345-why-is-the-universe-dark/
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/topic/268680-atom-why-did-cern-fail/
http://www.unexplained-mysteries.com/forum/topic/267586-the-universe-is-rotating/ etc.

https://www.facebook.com/slavko.sedic (comments on articles  space.com; phys.org; NASA etc.)     


.